$199
2 or 4 Stars (see the conclusion)
Ashley Kramer discovers how to pump up the volume and rattle his rib cage without driving the neighbours to bass distraction.
ONE SATURDAY, NOT that long ago, I was wandering the halls of Sylvia Park, my local mega-mall, when I strolled into the Sony Style store. Aimlessly taking in the products, I noticed what had to be the strangest set of headphones Iโd ever seen โ they looked like scaled down monster truck tyres complete with tread and hubcaps. You have to actually see these things in the flesh, or even better, wear them for a while to appreciate just how big they are, not only in terms of the diameter but also the depth of the earcups. With a pair of 70mm drivers lurking beneath all that padding, the mighty MDRXB1000 were the flagship model of Sonyโs Extra Bass range of headphones.
Not entirely convinced that Iโd want all that padding on my head on a sunny day, I figured that these fat Sonyโs, which looked like the biggest, baddest โphones ever, could maybe truly do justice to the intro drums on Smashing Pumpkinsโ โStand Inside Your Loveโ. Then and there, I resolved to get in a set for review. The next Monday, I got in touch with Sony NZ, only to be told that a replacement for the MDRXB1000 was on its way, so there was no point in reviewing the outgoing model.
I tempered my dismay with fevered imaginings of the new version. I had no doubt that there would be even bigger earpads, more immense drivers, and EXTRA bass. Even better, theyโd be engineered by Sony, so the bass should theoretically still be tight and in balance: I was thinking big, firm and bountiful not loose and wobbly.
A month or so later and the replacement model โ the MDR-XB900, finally arrived. I got hold of a set and was immediately uneasy because the box was moderately sized and there was no way that โphones with 70mm (or bigger) drivers were packed in there unless they folded up using quantum mechanics. Reading the back of the box told me that these โphones had 50mm drivers. Consider me disappointed.
Donโt get me wrong, 50mm is still a big driver, but Iโd been expecting huge. However, the MDR-XB900โs do have an โAdvanced Direct Vibe Structureโ to aid the bass, not to mention that โEngineered by Sonyโ tag, so there would no doubt be bass aplenty, albeit without the visual impact of the previous model.
Features and Construction
The MDR-XB900โs are lovely to look at โ the dark metal side plates on the earcups contrast very nicely with the brushed silver and black finish on the headband. Theyโre well built, too. Besides the aforementioned plates, thereโs not a great deal of metal in the design but theyโre pretty solid nonetheless โ the big hinge initially feels a bit fragile but itโs more substantial than it seems and itโs not likely to disintegrate in a hurry.
These โphones are a folding design and theyโll compress down to a reasonably compact package. Iโd like to see at least a soft carry bag supplied with them but at the price, Iโm not going to get too stressed about its absence. The cable is a non-detachable type and is missing the Apple remote Iโm so fond of but again at the price, Iโm not too fussed. The cable is however one of Sonyโs new flat tangle free types with a serrated surround that cuts friction, thereby reducing the tendency to tangle.
The MDR-XB900โs are an on-ear design, with soft, seamless ear pads, which makes them quite comfortable to wear, although this is very much dependent on personal preference โ some people donโt like their โphones sitting on top of their ears. The headband provides a fair amount of spring loading, which translates into some pressure against the ears, particularly when youโve got a big head like mine. That said, without some pressure, the โphones would shift and fall off at every opportunity; in any event, while the pressure was always noticeable, it was never a problem and these โphones remained a pleasure to wear over the long-term.
Sound Quality
So the MDR-XB900โs are unashamedly designed to generate bass. Do they succeed? Do they ever! Godzilla stamping angrily on the pedal of a skyscraper- sized kick drum couldnโt pump out this amount of bass. For sheer weight and power, Iโve never heard anything like it, and Iโve heard a lot of โphones in my time.
Some additional bass weight is something Iโm happy with in a mobile headphone or earphone environment because thereโs not much worse than thin sounding โphones โ all sibilant treble and thick midrange. Iโm not a bass-nut but that extra warmth and presence way down low is a good thing when youโre out on the street or enmeshed in a noisy transit system of some sort.
Then again, as anyone whoโs heard a badly set up home theatre system can testify, too much bass is not a good thing. The fat, room-shaking โwoompa woompaโ of a big subwoofer with its volume knob turned to maximum level is a sonic disaster, all the more so if youโre unfortunate enough to be wearing a pair of them around your head.
Forget about having subs around your head, thatโs nowhere near extreme enough to describe the first time I tried the MDR-XB900โs. It was more like having my head trapped inside a really large, badly tuned, loud subwoofer. In a word โ awful! The bass was so big that it dwarfed everything else, crushing it with overemphasized low octaves. At best, with relatively bass-light music, it was like listening to a three-way loudspeaker with a faulty midrange driver and a dead tweeter. At worst, with bass torture tracks, these โphones were pretty much intolerable.
They did the spoken word absolutely no favours either โ I was watching Season 2 of the excellent Breaking Bad on my MacBook Pro while I had the MDR-XB900โs on hand. They made Walter White sound like Darth Vader; heaven only knows what they would have done with Vaderโs vocals.
Was I looking at my first ever zero star review here? It certainly sounded that way. I was baffled to think that this product originated from a Sony factory and not a two-dollar store. Perhaps this was a faulty set? Actually, there seemed to be no other explanation unless every engineer and quality control specialist in the headphone division had been suddenly rendered deaf or transformed into head-banging zombies.
Then I got to thinking โ Iโd been less than impressed with a set of brand-new Sennheiser HD650โs back in 2006. After a few hours of heavy running in, however, I liked them so much I bought them. Could the MDR-XB900โs just need a workout? If so, they needed a beating! I hooked them up to my iPod Classic, set the volume to about 90%, cued up my training playlist and walked away.
Two hours later, I had another listen and hey presto โ we had some progress. The bass had tightened up a bit but more importantly, the recessed midrange and shy treble had made a strong appearance, which made for a much more balanced character. Two hours later and the MDR-XB900โs actually sounded like a pair of headphones, not an empty 50 gallon drum rolling down a rocky mountainside. They never morphed into a set of audiophile โphones but they did get noticeably better with time.
As expected, the โExtra Bassโ was still there, but it was much tighter and far less dominant than it was before the hard run-in period. No one will ever accuse these โphones of being lean, cool, or even close to neutral but for bass freaks, head bangers and dub lovers, they offer bass grunt thatโs just not found on more accurate models.
When I first heard them, Iโd no more have wanted to listen to Massive Attackโs โInertia Creepsโ from Mezzanine than Iโd have wanted to breathe water. After the run in on the other hand, I not only braved this track but also thoroughly enjoyed it. The suitably massive drums that kick in at the 48-second mark were rendered with colossal weight and a sense of impact that must be very close to the way this track was meant to be heard in a club setting. The big low end was still tight and reasonably fast; not as well controlled as the SkullCandy Aviator 2.0โs I reviewed recently, but dramatically deeper.
On other bass-heavy tracks, the MDR-XB900โs continued to excel. Theyโre by no means the kind of truthful โphones that audiophiles would use to immerse themselves in the decay of a Nils Lofgren guitar riff, but crank up โBullet In The Headโ from RATMโs epic eponymous CD and feel Commerfordโs bass pressurising your ears and youโll understand the attraction. Cue up Smashing Pumpkinsโ โStand Inside Your Loveโ or โBullet With Butterfly Wingsโ off Rotten Apples and give the volume control a whopping nudge and prepare for a pounding, rolling bass experience that fills the skull โ thin this sound isnโt, powerful it most certainly is.
The rest of the frequency range is handled reasonably well โ theyโre not the most revealing โphones in the world but theyโre just about spot on at the two hundred clams price point. Concerns along the lines of soundstage space or treble extension take a back seat to that bass, but thereโs no deep and abiding sense that these โphones are a one trick pony. Theyโre absolutely at their best with the levels up and the music heavy but I found that I was able to listen to mellow stuff too, although I always wanted to go back to the bass tracks after a while.
Conclusion
Lest you think Iโm being overly forgiving of the Sonyโs bass-heavy leaning, remember that theyโre aimed at a very specific demographic โ sometimes featuring big hair and saggy jeans, but always young, the target market is going to love these โphones. Some will say that the fact that I enjoyed the MDR-XB900โs as much as I did speaks volumes for my mental age.
Yes, of course thereโs too much bass but thatโs the entire, unapologetic point. The box says โExtra Bassโ so what did you expect? If you want response curves that have been carefully engineered to be as neutral as possible, then there are other options, although you may need to spend more money to get there. If you want to listen to a steady diet of Alison Krauss or Bob Dylan, then look elsewhere. If on the other hand, you like loud heavy music and want bass, bass and more bass thatโs omnipresent but not overbearing, then these are worth a try.
Much like one of those chain store โmini systemsโ with the flashing lights and the stickers proclaiming โ2,000 Wattsโ and โMEGA BASSโ, these โphones will put a smile on the face of any bass-head as surely as theyโll put a frown on an audiophileโs dial. Just do yourself a favour and give them some time to loosen up before you make a judgment call. Four stars then for bass lovers, two stars for people who want neutral โphones. ASHLEY KRAMER
www.sony.co.nz
Oh man – as a proud XB1000 owner I gotta say you are missing out! Not worth reviewing??? Oh my god – it’s worth reviewing just to tell people they are better than the subsequent generation! Sony came out with the “on ear” designs, but I think these are less comfortable, personally (but that could be a matter of taste). Also, you’ll notice the body design is similar to the XB600’s (which is far heavier than the XB500 design). Chances are, however, that they are less heavy than the hefty 13oz of the 1000’s (worth it). 70mm>50mm, ’nuff said. Sorry they talked you out of it